But Heather Coleman, Oxfam’s senior climate policy adviser, sees this (ever-so-thin) overlap of (ever-so-tenuous) agreement as an opportunity. “Those of us who are truly aware of the impacts of climate change find it appalling that climate change could be used as a laugh line,” Coleman said in a Skype interview. “[But] there’s a lot more that needs to be done and I think we can all come together on this issue of agriculture.”
A new Oxfam report released today hopes to close this understanding gap between climate change and global food prices, arguing previous research grossly underestimates future food prices by ignoring the impact of severe weather shocks to the global food system.
The report, “Extreme Weather, Extreme Prices,” argues current research paints only some of the picture by relying on steady increase in temperatures and precipitation. To get a more accurate picture, researchers threw down wild cards — the crazy weather events like droughts, hurricanes, and floods we’ve come to increasingly expect — to “stress-test” the system. They’ve come up with some disturbing numbers. Let’s start with the base-level expectations: The average price of staples like corn could more than double in the next 20 years worldwide compared to 2010 numbers, with rises in temperature and precipitation accounting for up to half of that increase. Then, add the extreme events which researches warn will cause shortages and destabilized markets, risking of a repeat of the 2007-8 food crisis that rocked Africa’s poorest. That crisis contributed to an 8 percent jump in the number of underfed people in Africa.
Here are the scenarios Oxfam outlines as possible superchargers of world hunger by 2030:
The report arrives during a week in which the U.N.’s three food agencies put out a joint statement issuing a warning to tackle food prices now or risk the third food crisis in four years. “Until we find the way to shock-proof and climate-proof our food system, the danger will remain,” the U.N. said. Expect a week of foodie data: The U.S. Department of Agriculture is releasing fresh household food security numbers, and the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization is expected to update numbers on how the U.S. drought is impacting global food prices.
Watch Coleman discuss findings from the new Oxfam report:
This story was produced as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.
24 comments:
While it is obvious that weather affects the production of food, I believe that this problem is something that could be rectified if the people in power across the globe chose to do so. With the amount of food that is destroyed every year in order to keep the market "level or fair" it is completely feasible to use that food in places where it is needed. Perhaps it is capitalism that stops it, or the greed of power to hold this over peoples heads. There is no way that the human race can control the climate or the extreme weather that the earth can unleash, but what they could do is work together. But, because it is not economically beneficial for people to transport excess foods, that would be destroyed otherwise, to places with people who truly needed it, prices will spike rendering it more difficult or in some cases impossible for people to feed their families.
Drastic weather patterns do to climate change are going to raise food prices,not exactly sure what what I'm suppose to do with this information. The jab at Mitt Romney makes me think maybe I should vote for Obama to but I know that isn't gonna solve the issue. So the conclusion I've come to is make more money so I can buy food when the food prices inevitably rise.
In the world or society we live in today, everyone seems to be extremely selfish because while some people are suffering from food shortage, we have people that are going out spending hundreds of dollars on food they don't even finish and eventually throw out. What this nations need to do is try to cut back on all the unnecessary spending and help one another. What would be a great idea is for the poor that are in need of the food and aren't able to pay for it, they can exchange the favor by doing some community service. LIke working on the fields or helping package these product up.Everyone can help in so many ways and this way more is being done. As for the climate changes, we all as one are destroying our planet like it or not.
Like I said the nation has to cut back or even go back. Back to our past were people actually walked to were they needed to go or jumped on their bikes. I honestly believe that changes have to be made, not later on but now.
Our weather patterns today are much different than they were 100 years ago. Our nation has to stress on our people to begin to help one another with cleaning up our world. Society should be encouraged to try to grow their food as much as possible. I feel that with people growing their own food they will appreciate it much more and will save money tremendously. Raising food prices is not going to stop our country from buying food, just like raising gas prices did not stop people from driving, and there was no drastic effect from this change. Instead of trying to cut stuff out and raise prices on goods, our society and world should come together and begin to make changes with rewards to those who do participate in the change. Growing our own food in our backyards will help cut out a lot of transportation methods that tend to pollute our environment that leads to a climate change effect.
I find it very interesting that none of the researchers had thought to include the shock effect of extreme weather in their models before now. It seems that if it is truly experts producing these models, they would have been able to have the foresight to take those events into account. It highlights the fact that either experts are not as all-knowing as we often think them to be, or that geopolitics play a bigger role in science and research than is appropriate. Hopefully, with these more accurate and dismal forecasts, citizens will place more pressure on their governments to act on this problem. It's necessary for awareness of these forecasts to become widespread before that can happen, though.
It seems that the only way people will realize that they are doing great harm to Earth is to change prices on them. Once money is involved people then begin to realize something is not right. Our country seems to ignore obvious environmental issues as long as it does not effect their everyday routine, but when they have to pay a little extra for food it catches their attention. I'm sure the drastic change in climate plays a big role in our food supply but I think that we must change the way we get our food, maybe by growing our own food. If we are going to take and take from our planet then we need to give back as well, or else we may come across a day where it will have nothing left to give us.
Those who truly understand the journey that the food we eat takes to make it to our plate should be alarmed that global disasters have gone unaccounted for in previous research models (ignorance is bliss). I agree with the U.N.'s statement that "Until we find the way to shock-proof and climate-proof our food system, the danger will remain". However, because we have little to no direct control over such events, it seems to me this is a near impossible task (for the existing system).
Global warming is a very controversial issue. The majority of scientists are led to believe it is the cause of climate change, yet there is still a small percentage who believe otherwise. Regardless of why the climate is changing, it is still changing worldwide and most likely will continue to as long as we contribute to global warming. As a result of this change in weather and precipitation, everyone will have to pay the price, although some will be more fotunate than others. Living In the United states, we will not understand fully the severity of this situation until most of our money is being flushed away on food. However, by that time developing countries will be starved, as they spend almost 100 percent of their income on food already and can not afford to survive with these rising prices. It is a shame we can not all come together and put our human race first instead of just our individual country. We are all dealing with the same issue and unfortunatley some others will have to pay the burden of the price.
The relationship between the rise of food prices and adverse weather conditions seemed pretty obvious to me. We should definitely start to consider other alternatives such as hydroponics, having your own personal garden, and research on more efficient techniques to producing food. The U.N. made this statement in response to the potential danger of another food crisis, “Until we find the way to shock-proof and climate-proof our food system, the danger will remain.” This implies that the food prices will stabilize as soon as they fix the weather problem. Attempting to develop a food system that is immune to the random conditions of Mother Nature does not only seem inconceivable, but somewhat irrelevant. I understand that producing and taking care of our food are definitely vital components to sustaining the food system; however, weather conditions are not the only factors that supplement the rise of food. Alluding to the photo, it displays how the drought in North America could increase world market export prices for maize. Well, doesn’t the U.S. government subsidize corn production for ethanol? The cost of oil and gas prices also contributes to the rise of food because food does not magically appear in grocery stores, transportation is involved. Also, it wouldn’t hurt some of us to limit our consumption of food. Evidently there is more to acknowledge, in addition to weather conditions, when trying to deal with the rise of food prices.
All the research leads to one conclusion. Change has to be made. Clearly, the food industry in this world is being affected by the damage in our environment. As people drive cars and purchase goods from far, gases are emitted into our atmosphere. Whether it is by large cargo trucks or factory smoke fumes, gases are emitted into our air and contributing to acid rain. Acid rain in drastic amounts can be toxic to plant life and crops, contributing to a loss of nutrients and absorption of chemicals like sulfuric and phosphoric acid. As our environment continues to face problems such as acid rain, crops will continue to die and the cost of foods will increase. To alleviate this issue, a good idea would be to grow ones own foods and contribute less to the demand on transportation of goods. But before any change could occur, people must reach consensus and take action.
One piece of information I can take away from this article is that weather patterns help control food prices. I do believe climate change to be important issue but most of American society does not. Honestly, I don't think the American population will really give this topic thought or a fair shot at being improved until we here in America are greatly affected. Paying more for goods as time goes by is something that Americans have just come to terms with. We all know that one day something might be this price and the next day it can increase significantly. Until we actually have certain foods missing from our local supermarket I don’t think the American population will put in serious thought to help changing the problem on a global level.
In the U.S., factory farms in the meat industry are accountable for more greenhouse gas emissions than all of transportation (airplanes, cars). The inefficiencies of the modern food industry are so numerous that solutions on a large scale may be challenging to define. If people truly cared about reducing climate change, they would eat less red meat, as cows' and pigs' feces create methane if decomposed anaerobically. In other words, when the feces is in such a mass quantity that it's piled up in massive ditches. Other students have addressed the topic of food waste. The U.S. produces 4,000 calories per capita everyday, and throws away half of all that is produced. The food unable to decompose in landfills create methane as well. If the end goal is to prevent greenhouse gas emissions and ultimately climate change, then we would waste less, eat less meat, and recreate a truly personal connection to our food that humans once felt.
"Democrats blame record drought. Republicans blame Obama." While this statement is by no means meant to address the positions of both parties in their entirety, I must posit that I completely disagree with these stances. While our over-consumption and waste in the U.S. is a major concern, it is only a drop in the ocean. Our primary environmental concern should be our population bomb. It is nearly impossible to curb our society's consumption habits (in addition, many developing countries such as India and China are attempting to emulate U.S. opulence.) Thus, with everyone aspiring to this lifestyle it is imperative that we then limit the population size not only in these countries but to be equitable all countries. With tighter regulations, impact on the environment can become better-restricted and we can begin to quantify our environmental degradation and get a sense of how to better "weather" our weather.
As we have seen numerous times politicians have always found a way to neglect the obvious affects of climate change and ridicule it. Being their state of power and influence many people agree with what they says on issues like climate change. I feel that more awareness has to be brought to these issues. People should look into buying their foods from local farmers market and buy food that is in season and rely less on the international food markets. Also another really important fact to consider is that with the expected 9 billion people that will in habitant this earth in the next ten years, the stress on food and its prices will rise even more. So local food should become staple.
I believe there is a common consensus amongst the Pace community that the effects of anthropogenic climate change is having a much larger impact on an international scale than previously anticipated. The author of the article suggests the rise in global temperature has increased the likelihood of severe weather of which can contribute to food shortages. The author uses corn as an example of one crop doubling in price in the next 20 years. If corn prices double, I suspect in the U.S. there will be more of a push by subsidy farmers and seed corporations to distribute and grow genetically modified corn seeds that can withstand severe weather such as droughts, which most of the U.S. have experienced this year. This could contribute to a host of new environmental and social problems such as monocultures, further loss of diversity, even more powerful monopolies, and skyrocketing prices. Furthermore, how will nations such as Brazil and Mexico, whose maze crops are staples in their communities used for food to fuel will respond to changes in weather, increasing food prices, and quite possibly crop shortages. It is unlikely developed nations will respond with cutting back on overconsumption, and the growing populations of developing countries pose not only a threat toward food prices, but higher pollution levels, and quite possibly water shortages as well, a subject of which pales in comparison to oil or food.
I agree with what many people have mention about people in developed countries (especially the U.S.) wasting a TON of food. This waste is unacceptable and does worsen the problem of food shortage. On the other hand, the issue does go deeper than just the waste of food in more wealthy nations. A large percentage of food which is donated by wealthy countries to help relieve food shortage to countries in need is wasted as well. Because these countries do not have the proper infrastructure to store and distribute the donated food, a lot of it goes bad and does not get eaten. This situation is mostly found in nations with consistent food shortage. It is an issue of governments not being efficient or careful about the aid they give out. Its just as short sighted as ignoring the correlation between our impact on weather patterns and the impact these changed have on our ability to produce food.
The whole situation is a blatant call to use farming practices which are less harmful to the land and which capture its potential instead. When there is respect for limits in the way and amount of food we should be producing, production is more efficient in the long run because the food is of such a higher quality.
Because corn and grain are easily stored, they are heavily subsidized food products. It seems a little far-fetched to me that we don't have any stored up in case of an ecological disaster and if there was a higher demand on food wouldn't it be logical to stop capping the food market with said subsidies? Also, this is fairly unrelated, but if we were to subsidize healthier, greener goods like fruits and vegetables rather than meat and corn, we'd probably have a nation that could sustain itself on a smaller and healthier diet. It would help the environment and possibly slow climate change by cutting down on factory farmed meat. We put a lot of water and feed into cows that could go to feeding families instead. The blame game the republicans and democrats are playing is a counter-productive us-versus-them mentality. Not to pull the hippie card, but if we stopped picking sides and worked together I think a lot of our issues would get resolved.
The political boundries need to be removed dealing with this issue because it is something that we as a planet are facing together. Pollution, over consuption and waste occurs all too often in developed countries, yet we see the effects of climate change negatively impacting the undeveloped nations on a much larger scale, and they do not have the means to try and fight it. The problem comes from over population, and I truly believe that it is impossible for positive change to occur until the number of humans decreases dramatically. Until this happens the price of food will continue to go up because it is becoming harder and harder produce.
The more people there are on the planet, the more food will be consumed. That is a fact. Therefore food will need to be produced at a faster rate, which would require more labor, which would require more workers, which would in turn cause prices to rise. The population is increasing at a rapid rate and this is causing food to be more scarce and more expensive. Overpopulation is a large contributor to climate change as well because more people means more energy and emissions are produced. The most populated regions are usually the developed countries and they require the most food. Therefore, underdeveloped countries are receiving less food due to the high demand in the developed countries. Bottom line is over population is causing food prices to rise. Also climate change is causing a disturbance in weather patterns which causes crop cycles to become interrupted. This sometimes causes losses of enire fields of crops because weather conditions causes everything to die. We need to find a solution to these problems soon.
Obviously weather affects the production of food. But in my opinion we cant stop the next food crisis. We are already too far along the path of global warming and decreased precipitation that even if we turn back now there will still be a problem in 2020. Although we do need to start now to change our pollution habits to fix the climate change, some of the damage is permanent. But i still believe the sooner we start to actually make an impact on this environmental issue the better, but it could be too late already.
timberland shoes, hollister clothing, converse shoes, karen millen, moncler, louboutin, juicy couture outlet, air max, ray ban, wedding dress, moncler, parajumpers outlet, canada goose uk, hollister, montre femme, supra shoes, converse, canada goose, toms outlet, canada goose outlet, gucci, canada goose pas cher, coach outlet, nike air max, iphone 6 case, canada goose outlet, canada goose, vans, canada goose outlet, oakley, moncler, moncler, ugg, lancel, ralph lauren, hollister canada, baseball bats, juicy couture outlet, louis vuitton canada, moncler, replica watches, canada goose, moncler outlet, moncler, ugg boots, uggs canada
chenlina20160527
ray ban sunglasses outlet
jordans for sale
air jordan 8
nike store
ray ban sunglasses
louis vuitton purses
christian louboutin outlet
coach outlet
hollister
adidas running shoes
mont blanc fountain pens
designer handbags
nike air force 1
louis vuitton handbags
michael kors purses
louis vuitton outlet
ray ban wayfarer
louis vuitton outlet
louis vuitton bags
ray ban sunglasses
kobe 10
nike free runs
oakley sunglasses
ralph lauren outlet
nike basketball shoes
polo outlet
nike sb
asics shoes
ray ban sunglasses
ray ban sunglasses
coach outlet
michael kors
air jordans
christian louboutin shoes
toms outlet
fitflops sale clearance
jordan 4
cheap jordans
nike uk
christian louboutin outlet
as
zzzzz2018.9.1
nike outlet
ugg boots
ugg boots clearance
oakley sunglasses
coach outlet
canada goose jackets
nhl jerseys wholesale
christian louboutin shoes
christian louboutin sale
adidas outlet
Post a Comment